Exploring perceptions of self-stigma of substance use and current alcohol and marijuana use patterns among college students.

BACKGROUND: While research has examined the effect of stigma from others towards individuals with substance use disorders, few studies have examined the relationship between perceived self-stigma and engagement in substance use more broadly, especially among non-clinical samples. AIMS: The present study examined the relationships between perceptions of self-stigma if one were to develop a substance use disorder, consisting of negative self-esteem and negative self-efficacy, and alcohol or marijuana use behaviors and outcomes. METHOD: Participants (n = 2,243; 71.5% female) were college students within the U.S. recruited to participate in an online survey on substance use with a special focus on alcohol and marijuana. RESULTS: Results indicated no significant differences in stigma scores across individuals with different lifetime alcohol and marijuana use. Stigma ratings did differ between individuals with different profiles of last 30-day alcohol and marijuana use where, generally, individuals with lifetime use but no use in the last 30-day reported higher levels of self-stigma. Correlation analyses indicated that perceived impact of substance use disorder on sense of self-efficacy and self-esteem related negatively to nearly all observed factors of alcohol and marijuana use. CONCLUSIONS: Though self-stigma, and stigma more broadly, has been shown to have negative implications for people with substance use disorders, the present study suggests that for non-clinical populations there may be some protective association between perceived self-stigma and alcohol or marijuana use engagement. This is not to say that self-stigma is a positive clinical intervention. Rather, we interpret these findings to indicate that negative perceptions of substance use disorder on the sense of self may be associated with distinct alcohol and marijuana use behaviors among young adults.

Environmental enrichment sex-dependently rescues memory impairment in FABP5 KO mice not mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are intracellular carriers of bioactive lipids and play a role in the trafficking of endocannabinoids as well as polyunsaturated fatty acids. Mice lacking the FABP5 gene have memory impairments. Environmental enrichment is a potent manipulation known to rescue or improve memory performance. The extent to which the memory impairments in FABP5 knockout (KO) mice can be rescued or improved through environmental conditions remains to be understood. To address this, we raised wild type (WT) and FABP5 KO mice in either socially isolated or environmental enrichment conditions during adolescence. Once in adulthood, mice were tested for Novel Object Recognition (NOR), T-maze, and Morris Water Maze (MWM) to evaluate memory performance. Mice were then euthanized to assess hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentrations. MWM results showed that male FABP5 KO mice performed worse compared to WT counterparts. Male and female mice raised in an enriched environment improved performance regardless of genotype. Results on the NOR test showed that male FABP5 KO mice displayed lower object recognition compared to WT counterparts across both environments. No differences of genotype or environment were seen in female mice. T-maze findings revealed impaired performance in socially isolated FABP5 KO mice. Adolescent environmental enrichment rescued this deficit in male, but not female, FABP5 KO mice. Lastly, environmental enrichment increased hippocampal BDNF levels in male WT mice only. Our results corroborate the previously observed role of the FABP5 gene on memory performance and identify an important interaction with the environment during adolescence.

A Meta-Analysis of Cue Reactivity in Tobacco Cigarette Smokers.

INTRODUCTION: The cue reactivity paradigm allows for systematic evaluation of motivational responses to drug-related cues that may elicit drug use. The literature on this topic has grown substantially in recent decades, and the methodology used to study cue reactivity has varied widely across studies. The present research provided a meta-analytic investigation of variables that have an impact on cue reactivity effects to enhance our understanding of this key feature of tobacco use disorders. METHODS: A total of 128 publications yielded 249 effect sizes, which were analyzed to investigate the magnitude of the cue reactivity effect and potential moderators. RESULTS: Craving generated a moderate-to-large effect size (Hedges' g = 0.71, p < .001), indicating that drug cues produced significantly greater craving than neutral cues. However, physiological variables yielded significantly lower or nonsignificant effect sizes. Analyses of a variety of empirically and theoretically relevant moderator variables showed that cue modality, cue personalization, cue reactivity environment, and the use of multiple assessments of cue reactivity were significantly associated with the magnitude of cue-specific craving effects (ps < .001). Effect sizes were not significantly related to abstinence status, gender, cigarettes per day, and treatment-seeking status. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscored the strength of self-reported craving as an index of cue reactivity across studies, which support theories that posit cue reactivity is core to the addictive process for daily tobacco cigarette smokers. The present research further elucidates the variables that alter the cue reactivity effects across studies and provides recommendations for future cue reactivity research. IMPLICATIONS: A core feature of addiction is that drug-related cues can have a major impact on motivational responses across multiple substance use disorders, including tobacco cigarettes. This paper describes a meta-analysis updating and synthesizing cue reactivity research with tobacco cigarette smokers over the last 20 years, a time of rapid growth for this literature. The study leads to a better understanding of the cue reactivity paradigm across different self-report and physiological variables and identifies factors that may modulate addictive motivation for tobacco cigarettes.